Since the mid-1970s, I have constantly wondered if a
6x6 medium format camera was always better for street photography than 35mm
rangefinder cameras. Of course I continue to use 35mm Leica rangefinder cameras
from late 1930s even today. But I always carry a twin Lens Reflex medium format
camera with me, just in case… My 1948 Rolleiflex or 1970s Minolta Autocord
remain my favorites.
But there is one camera that has always attracted
me, primarily because of one of its lenses. It is my 1976 Mamiya M645 6x4.5
camera and the Mamiya Sekor C 80mm f1.9
lens. There is a magical character to that lens when wide open. After using
hundreds of portraiture lenses in all formats, I have to say that the Mamiya
when open to f1.9 is the portraiture lens
with the creamiest bokeh and adorable
tonal range. Of course I only use B&W film, for which I think this lens is
most unique.
…So, a couple of days ago there was an Inter-tribal
Native Arts weekend gathering in town. Native American tribes from Arizona and
surrounding states joined together for drum beat, singing, dancing and
showcasing various forms of arts creations.
For a street photographer, it is heavenly when large
groups of people gather!
After thinking for a short while, I decided to take
the M645 and 80mm lens with me. I would not be able to take photos from a
distance as the 80mm is equivalent to 50mm in 35 mm format, but I wanted to see
how the lens would do under the brightest of the high desert suns. I set the
shutter speed to 1/250 second and the aperture to f8.
… There were photographers each with a couple of
digital cameras hanging from the harness they wore given the weight of these monstrous
tools. And the lenses on them seemed they could take photos of a flea’s
eyelashes from a mile away…
Next to them, my 1976 M645 looked anachronistic,
diminutive, and odd. I almost had to cover
it with my hands given the looks some of the young attendants were giving me.
But that ended when a man in his 80s came to me and said “Gosh, I used to have
one of these in the 1970s. It still works?”
To which I replied “Sometimes it does.”
Consequently, I decided to take a few photos and test
my assumption.
…The opening photo of the three dancers is about composition
and privacy. We were told not to take pictures
of the dancers if they did not allow us, but it seemed too difficult to do so
as they were dancing around the field and we had no opportunity to ask for
permission. So I decided to take a photo without the faces of the dancers
showing. Plus, it was a windy day and I had to guess when the wind would blow
the head-feathers all in the same direction. Finally, I wanted the American flag
to be positioned in a way that tells a story.
I chose this photo also because there is a flare on
the left side, making the first dancer from the left less focused and hazier. I
find that attractive because it accentuates the feel of ancient optic/old
photography. But there is a purposeful reason for it:
I have a modern Besseler enlarger but often I like
using my 1960s Hansa Pro simple enlarger because the enlarger lens mount is the
Leica 39mm mount which means that I can use Leica (and its clones) camera
lenses instead of enlarger lenses. The use of Leica 39mm screw mount on both
cameras and enlargers was to allow photographers in the 1940s and 1950s to take
pictures with the Leica camera, then take the lens off, mount it on the
enlarger and print the negatives in the darkroom. But the camera lenses are not
made the same way as an enlarger lens (they are not flat field) and there will be
distortions and flare when used as an enlarger lens.
While many see distortions and flare as nefarious, I
see them as unpredictable and creative!
Here is my 1960s enlarger with a 1940s Soviet/Ukrainian
Industar-22 Leica 39mm screw lens. I
love using this lens to take photos, but sometimes, as in the photo of the
three dancers, it adds that unexpected outcome to a captured moment I print.
Ok, while every other photo-taker was incessantly
clicking on their digital cameras to capture every move of the dancers, the
street photographer in me was looking for a story elsewhere.
And I found it. There was a little girl under the
umbrella tent next to me and the dancers were in the background. I opened the
lens to f5.6 and here is the magic of
the Mamiya lens – the background is delightfully smooth in bokeh. The dancers are like whirling spirits, and the trees like clouds. But little
girl is perfectly focused.
The next generation. Continuity, beauty and hope.
April 15, 2019
© Vahé A. Kazandjian, 2019
Vahe; it is lovely photography. With the juxtaposition of the American flag in the background of what appears to be plains Indian dancers you have captured the irony of the US/Native American relationship. I see the continuity and beauty, but hope--I am not so sure. If these folks came from the Pine Ridge Reservation-not so much hope for this child. Lowest life expectancy in the Western Hemisphere.
ReplyDelete